Winsford Academy, watch out watchout there is a Walsh about.

Damien Walsh, the desperately flawed ex-police officer, has gained a job as the Behaviour Manager at Winsford Academy. Damien will be taking his brand of egotistically bulling into a new sphere.

If you have a complaint about a teacher, then do not take it to Damien or let him have anything to do with investigating it. As an inspector at Merseyside Police, he spent considerable time intimidating and threatening people who made complaints.

Damien is a craven coward who will always back authority and the officers no matter how wrong they are. The mistakes they have made are irrelevant because they are the law. Often he would not even ask the nature or details of the complaint but would begin the meeting or call with threats. He has no integrity at all.

 

Ged Fitzgerald

Back in May the CEO of the Liverpool City Council was arrested the only real surprise was that the arrest was for "on suspicion of conspiring to pervert the course of justice and intimidating witnesses." did not seem to relate to his time at LCC. Who is supposed to have been intimidated has not been made clear, and Fitzemup's bail has been extended to the 22nd of August, all the while he is on fully paid bail leave, though apparently still available to Joe Anderson and other members of the Scallocracy.

In the absence of Fitzinacell the level of dodgy, possibly criminal staff at the top of LCC is being patched over by the temporary elevation of Chris Walsh and Jeanette McLaughlin, City Solicitor & Monitoring Officer. The first provides false statements to the police while the second engages in full investigations which produce no results, either to the complainant via either the complaints process or the Data Protection Act.

Fitzgerald had late in 2016 been caught out lying to the Local Government Ombudsman and the Information Commissioner, but so far that matter does not have a court date. He is less than popular with the ICO after promising statements from 3rd parties, supporting his allegations regarding a complainant, which they noted he "failed to produce".

Fitzgerald & McLaughlin are on the left.

Chris Walsh in the waistcoat.

Stop Press, August 23, 2022.

See Court News

Good deal from LCC

Are Merseyside police getting land for new HQ to cheap? See Here.

Ged Stamper

The first obstacle you will come across when trying to deal with Merseyside police, is Stamper Ged Kenneth Gerard.K.Stamper@merseyside.police.uk Sergeant S&A Threat Harm Risk, I know what sergeant means but the rest who knows.
Threat to who? Harm to who? Risk to who? he is obviously quite proud of it as he has it on his email. The S&A presumably stands for stall & abandon, though it could be anything. From all the info I can gather someone getting near to retiring, and balder than me.

He is apparently very proud of Merseyside police, in fact so proud he is quite happy to cover up for people like Damian Wash, Constable Edge, John Smyth etc. He must be quite happy with his contribution to keeping what has been brushed under the carpet, brushed under the carpet.

My advice is, don't deal with him, he basically a snide little shit, quite happy to avoid the problem by stating that we have stamped the documents, therefore it is over. The law honesty and integrity don't bother him as long as the forms have been filled in then they define reality.

He has appeared in some corruption cases but they seem to be more to do with morals, rather than behaviour as a copper, is perhaps Stamper suffering from a bit of religion, he doesn't seem to care about the effect that cops have on real people, only that god may be offended, or at least his vision of god, perhaps the Jesuits at SFX did a thorough job on him.

The dark arts of transcribing police interviews.

1. Everything said by the person being interviewed shall be written in capital letters to give the impression they are shouting.
2. Everything said by the interviewer will be written in the correct mix of upper and lower case.
3. Any grammatical error made by the person being interviews will be included.
4. Any grammatical error made by the interviewer will be omitted
5. Any requests made by the subject for definitions of words used will be included.
6. Any request for definitions made by the interviewing officer will be omitted, unless slang. e.g. "obsequious"
7. Any words mispronounce by the subject will be spelt phonetically.
8. Any words mispronounced by the interviewer will be correctly spelt. e.g. "anti path e" to antipathy.
9. All instance of the interviewee pointing out that the question being asked is loaded will be omitted, only the refusal to answer will be noted.
10. Any time that both the interviewer and interviewee are both talking will be described as the interviewee talking over the interviewer.
11. Any attempts by the interviewee to provide a full answer will be described as rambling.
12. Any attempt by the interviewee to assert themselves will be described as hostility, aggression or ranting.
13. Any attempt by the interviewer to assert themselves will be described as "calming the situation down".

Lies and more lies.

Turns out the most honest thing is Merseyside Police is the mail bouncing. Send an email to
1384@merseyside.police.uk and get a bounce.

Gunatilleke Nicholas

To XXXXXX

Today at 2:47 PM

I will be on Annual Leave unitl Wednesday 31st December  2015

If your enquiry is urgent please email DCI Christopher Sefton or Hazel Fothergill

The really interesting bit is the spelling, makes it clear that the PA to the Chief Constable told more lies than I thought in my conversation with her.In what world is lying not offensive and abusive?

Wenstone.

Wenstone.

Derbyshire.

Also popular in Derbyshire 86.191.165.0. so popular that updates trigger an email.

Loyal reader

I wonder who my most loyal reader 94.175.230.0 -> 94.175.230.63 is?

Nick Nick Nick? or one of Nick Nick Nick's mates.

Constable 1384 Nick Gummer-tellery.

What a delightful day of telephone talks with Merseyside Police, first there is the always enjoyable process of getting past reception, they now claim to be trained in the law. I have to say it doesn't show. Is it that the police are spending the cash on solicitors to answer the phone or is it that the receptionists are lying. Some of the higher up ones in the Chief cons office are so up themselves that they will not even repeat a name they have used or spell it out, but somehow think themselves not rude.
Anyway, back to Nick apparently Nick doesn't can't investigate things that happened in the past. So presumably that means he only investigates crimes while they are going on, in the case of a stabbing while the knife is still in the victim.
When someone has said it wasn't a crime, then it is all over, even if the person making the claim hasn't investigated, hasn't looked just feels that it would be inconvenient for someone if the truth came out. For people like Nick, reality is determined by what people in authority say is reality, no messing about with the actual reality, it is a quasi religious view.
However, there may well be something else going on with Nick, when told that evidence was going to still be collected, questions still going to be asked, there was the sound of a sneer in his voice when he said, "and what are you going to do when it you have it", which sounds very much like a boast that he and his mates have control of the judicial system, you only get access if they want, and no matter what proof you have it useless unless we give it the nod.
In schools there are several different types of bully, one of the nastier types is the type that uses teachers to do their bullying, they are goody little two shoes as far as the teachers are concerned, but they have the teachers wrapped around their finger, if you annoy these snide little bullies or don't do what they want, then they drop you in shit with TPTB, this sounds a lot like quiet a few coppers.
I imagine that in the Milgram experiment, there would have been some outliers begging to give bigger shocks to appease the boss. Police corruption and incompetence flourish because of the servile nature of the cops, some of them are still prepared to give the "I was only following orders" a try out.
The reality is I don't want to spend the next 15-20 years like the last, and that is what Nick & Co are offering, without an understanding and acceptance of what happened in the past, then it will repeat itself.

Police Political Badge

Why are the police wearing a political badge, adding to their uniform, a reasonable question to ask a copper but what a surprise no answer.

No Names, No Number and No Rank

Can anyone work out what the name is here? It is Jon Murphy;s staff officer, after she said the name the person would not repeat it.

If anyone knows please comment.

Back to Brabners

It appears the evil empire that was Brabner, Chaffe and Street, has no shortened it name down to that of the original company Brabners. The other option was the The Crimson Permanent Assurance.

Arts Vigilantes.

What do Bob Scriven, Margaretha Schoening and Sue Leask have in common other than an address?
Perhaps conspiracy to pervert the courses of justice?
A life spent pilfering from the public purse via 3rd rate arts projects?
Perhaps just stupidity and gullibility?
Perhaps criminal conspiracy?
Anyway, all will out soon.

Liverpool man awarded £25,000 at Liverpool County Court after Jury decide he had been assaulted, falsely imprisoned and prosecuted maliciously by Merseyside Police officers

Well, it looks like if you can get the funds together, you can get to the truth, but it shows that PSDs are not interested in keeping the rank and file lawful but in maintaining the Police's reputation amongst the bigoted law and order brigade.

http://www.broudiejacksoncanter.co.uk/news/2014/08/liverpool-man-awarded-25000-at-liverpool-county-court-after-jury-decide-he-had-been-assaulted-falsely-imprisoned-and-prosecuted-maliciously-by-merseyside-police-officers

Lost and Found

Once in 2006 Jane Lake, now of the charity commission, could not find some historical statements made by staff at Brabners, this was somewhat fortunate, as they in not finding them, some lies failed to be exposed. The person these statements were written about was somewhat annoyed by the lies that these statements would have exposed, especially as the lies were being made to a court by police officers.
However, after many years the subject managed to find someone at Brabners who took mere minutes to find the statements that Lake had failed to find. The question is was it simple incompetence that made Lake incapable of finding the statements or something more worrying.

Hayley Sherwin

Det Supt Tim Keelan, Jane Kennedy & PC Haley Sherwen

I don't know anything about Keelan but the two on the right should not be allowed anything to do with mental health see here on Facebook Merseyside Police and Crime Commissioner.
In the case of Sherwin, she received an email from someone trying to locate another officer, despite this being clearly a case of mistaken ID and there being nothing at all threatening in the email, simply a request for information and clarification, Sherwen flipped and made allegations of harassment include comments about the author being delusional and there being no telling what they could do. Not the reaction of someone who is supposed to be working in the mental health area.
When the same individual contacted their then MP to try and get answers to similar questions, part of which was why Merseyside police believed they were severely mentally ill. They were abused by a member of her staff and complained to Kennedy. The result was not an investigation and a claim that without recordings of the phone call, it was impossible to ascertain the truth to tell, but a simple statement that her staff didn't do it and "were beyond suspicion".
This wasn't the first accusation made by a Merseyside Police officer to this individual, several others from then DCC Jon Murphy, PC Beatie and a Sergeant at Maghull had all been similarly abusive.
The police's belief that this individual had been previously sectioned, caused them not only to abuse them but to write to their doctor asking for details of the illness and for the FME to refuse to accept the name of the group GP practice given as their doctor, writing instead that the DP had refused to name their doctor.
These are not people who can live up to their commitments.

Damian Update

Perhaps I should ask Damo to explain himself 1 more time. https://www.facebook.com/damien.walsh.319

7172 McVeigh

Merseyside Police's 7172 has a very interesting approach to the law, part of that may be explained by her faulty memory. During one incident she decided to overlook an assault but later when details of the incident were the subject of an inquiry she even forgot which other officers were there. Which conveniently meant that this officer could not be asked why she had made particular comments.
 You would think that this would be prime grounds for an appeal, but no, all the boxes were ticked and the investigating officer did nothing wrong by not doing any proper investigation or rechecking before completing the report convenient hey.
 
 Any comments Jane Kennedy or is it an operational matter?

Turd

First Sgt Shit and now exInspector Turd.