Abandon All Hope, All Ye Who Enter Here

This is Copperas Hill police station on Copperas Hill in Liverpool. The sign inside the door read "Professional Standards Division, Criminal Investigation Bureau". The sign outside read "this is not an operational police station". The investigations they carry out here are most defiantly criminally incompetent and it definitely doesn't operate to police anyone especially the police. So for once a completely honest collection of words from Mersey Pig.

You can be sure that the inhabitants of this place will happily leave no stone unturned until they find a reason to let the officer off or they will keep on investigating till the complainant dies of old age.

Haydocks own Trooper Owen in da Hospital.
Well Deano it looks like you forgot to mention in your Hospital Cop Shop article that you will also harass members of the public on behalf of Members of Hospital staff. Mind you, you also forgot to mention that you where in Merseyside Police whilst patting them on the back here.
You are a bit of a thug aren't you Deano perhaps it's you lack of stature?
Now I put in a complaint about a copper "perverting the course of justice" and your suddenly on long term sick leave or is that a Euphemism?

Does this scan show if you have blood on your hands Dean?

Greggs the Wankers

A big blog welcome to train enthusiast solicitor Malcolm Gregg . Malcs hobbies include getting the Liverpool Moorfields to Ormskirk train and staring at people. It probably something he picked up at the Magistrates court from a legal advisor or perhaps directly from the police. Why would Malc want to antagonise defendants he saw in courts? Does he perhaps itch to be called to work for the CPS?

Veni, vidi, vici, Vicky

So was the woman looking awkward on the 4th of June outside Court 6 at Vernon street Victoria Crossley?

Is Victoria Crossley AKA Vicky from Brabners all those years ago?

Suing for PACE.
A nice little section of PACE states that the Police may only hold "seized objects as long as is necessary", what this means as as soon as the decide not to prosecute or that the objects are not evidence or the CPS drops the case then it is their responsibility to return the objects to you, as soon as is possible. If they wait for you to request them then they are breaking PACE.
Recently I applied via a Part 8 claim for an injunction requiring Merseyside Police to return equipment ceased. The Police in there statement admitted that they didn't need it any more but decided to oppose the action and instead suggested that 3 months was a responsible time to wait for the equipment. The judge disagreed.
For opposing this action Weightmans wanted cost of £3200 against me. Needless they didn't get it but it should have been obvious to anyone they would loose. That £3200 included £300 for a barrister and 6.5 hours of Victoria Crossleys time. In the end Caroline Ashcroft turned up in court and twigged when the Judge commented "he does seem to have the law on his side".
The case was further hampered by the fact that Hertfordshire Police who where subject to the same request on the same day revealed that they had attempted to return the equipment, of their own volition, but the Post office had lost it, and offered to pursue the Post Office on my behalf for the money.
Ms Ashcroft seemed to think that as Merseyside Police where a public body they where somehow excused, but of course Hertfordshire Police is also a public body. She also seemed unaware that Section 7.12(iii) required the Police to keep track of the equipment, so they can secure it if a request for it back is but through the courts. This means that, to paraphrase Ms Ascroft, "the officer who knows where it is, is off ill" is simply and indication of a breach of PACE.
Merseyside Police shouldn't pay the bill they where badly advised by there solicitors. How much money do Weightmans take every year from the Police?
Solicitors from Hell has an article on them here.
The bits of PACE.
Section 7.3 Officers must be aware of the provisions in the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, section 59, allowing for applications to a judicial authority for the return of property seized and the subsequent duty to secure in section 60, see paragraph 7.12(iii).
Section 7.12 (iii) "setting out the effect of sections 59 to 61 covering the grounds for a person with a relevant interest in seized property to apply to a judicial authority for its return and the duty of officers to secure property in certain circumstances when an application is made."
Section 7.14 "Subject to paragraph 7.15, anything seized in accordance with the above provisions may be retained only for as long as is necessary."

Setting the PACE
Section 2.3 a "bomb threat calls". This is very interesting it gives the police the right to crash through you door if they suspect a bomb threat call was made from the address. It is strange that in my case they waited 2 moths after the IPCC made the allegations. Surely an unacceptable delay.

Gavin Steele

Just to answer Gavin Steele comment as he was moving out of 22 Gambier Terrace, yes I do know, I even have some recordings of you that provide evidence of what are crooked little git you are. Hopefully you'll get to spend some time contemplating it. When I can be bothered, same goes for you mates in the house. If anyone currently living in the same building as you wants to know what you get up to I'll be happy to tell them. See you in court.

I wonder what you friends Mr Fry would think of your activities?

Google record

I wonder who keeps searching for the term Pirate and Brendan Ball on the Internet and ending up at blog? Mind you not content to find it one they keep searching under different titles with a comma without a comma, using a full stop are they thorough or neurotic?