It seems the Independent Office for Police Conduct, IOPC, is just the IPCC in disguise, right down to the corrupt staff. Take Micheal Williams doesn't seem to be able to read properly, when told that contact with exIPCC members is not allowed just stops signing emails.
No word from the big man Michael Lockwood on the actual complaint that is just ignored after trying to pass the entire thing of as an SRA.
IOPC helping improve police cover ups since 2017.
Now rebranded as the Very Office for Police Conduct. The personal opinions of the author throughout.
Welcome
Monday, August 02, 2021
Now you see them, now you don't.
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Winsford Academy, watch out watchout there is a Walsh about.
Damien Walsh, the desperately flawed ex-police officer, has gained a job as the Behaviour Manager at Winsford Academy. Damien will be taking his brand of egotistically bulling into a new sphere.
If you have a complaint about a teacher, then do not take it to Damien or let him have anything to do with investigating it. As an inspector at Merseyside Police, he spent considerable time intimidating and threatening people who made complaints.
Damien is a craven coward who will always back authority and the officers no matter how wrong they are. The mistakes they have made are irrelevant because they are the law. Often he would not even ask the nature or details of the complaint but would begin the meeting or call with threats. He has no integrity at all.
Thursday, July 20, 2017
Ged Fitzgerald
In the absence of Fitzinacell the level of dodgy, possibly criminal staff at the top of LCC is being patched over by the temporary elevation of Chris Walsh and Jeanette McLaughlin, City Solicitor & Monitoring Officer. The first provides false statements to the police while the second engages in full investigations which produce no results, either to the complainant via either the complaints process or the Data Protection Act.
Fitzgerald had late in 2016 been caught out lying to the Local Government Ombudsman and the Information Commissioner, but so far that matter does not have a court date. He is less than popular with the ICO after promising statements from 3rd parties, supporting his allegations regarding a complainant, which they noted he "failed to produce".
Fitzgerald & McLaughlin are on the left. |
Thursday, September 08, 2016
Monday, August 15, 2016
Ged Stamper
Threat to who? Harm to who? Risk to who? he is obviously quite proud of it as he has it on his email. The S&A presumably stands for stall & abandon, though it could be anything. From all the info I can gather someone getting near to retiring, and balder than me.
Saturday, February 13, 2016
The dark arts of transcribing police interviews.
2. Everything said by the interviewer will be written in the correct mix of upper and lower case.
3. Any grammatical error made by the person being interviews will be included.
4. Any grammatical error made by the interviewer will be omitted
5. Any requests made by the subject for definitions of words used will be included.
6. Any request for definitions made by the interviewing officer will be omitted, unless slang. e.g. "obsequious"
7. Any words mispronounce by the subject will be spelt phonetically.
8. Any words mispronounced by the interviewer will be correctly spelt. e.g. "anti path e" to antipathy.
9. All instance of the interviewee pointing out that the question being asked is loaded will be omitted, only the refusal to answer will be noted.
10. Any time that both the interviewer and interviewee are both talking will be described as the interviewee talking over the interviewer.
11. Any attempts by the interviewee to provide a full answer will be described as rambling.
12. Any attempt by the interviewee to assert themselves will be described as hostility, aggression or ranting.
13. Any attempt by the interviewer to assert themselves will be described as "calming the situation down".
Monday, December 28, 2015
Lies and more lies.
1384@merseyside.police.uk and get a bounce.
Gunatilleke Nicholas
The really interesting bit is the spelling, makes it clear that the PA to the Chief Constable told more lies than I thought in my conversation with her.In what world is lying not offensive and abusive?
Saturday, November 28, 2015
Friday, November 27, 2015
Thursday, November 26, 2015
Loyal reader
Nick Nick Nick? or one of Nick Nick Nick's mates.
Constable 1384 Nick Gummer-tellery.
Anyway, back to Nick apparently Nick doesn't can't investigate things that happened in the past. So presumably that means he only investigates crimes while they are going on, in the case of a stabbing while the knife is still in the victim.
When someone has said it wasn't a crime, then it is all over, even if the person making the claim hasn't investigated, hasn't looked just feels that it would be inconvenient for someone if the truth came out. For people like Nick, reality is determined by what people in authority say is reality, no messing about with the actual reality, it is a quasi religious view.
However, there may well be something else going on with Nick, when told that evidence was going to still be collected, questions still going to be asked, there was the sound of a sneer in his voice when he said, "and what are you going to do when it you have it", which sounds very much like a boast that he and his mates have control of the judicial system, you only get access if they want, and no matter what proof you have it useless unless we give it the nod.
In schools there are several different types of bully, one of the nastier types is the type that uses teachers to do their bullying, they are goody little two shoes as far as the teachers are concerned, but they have the teachers wrapped around their finger, if you annoy these snide little bullies or don't do what they want, then they drop you in shit with TPTB, this sounds a lot like quiet a few coppers.
I imagine that in the Milgram experiment, there would have been some outliers begging to give bigger shocks to appease the boss. Police corruption and incompetence flourish because of the servile nature of the cops, some of them are still prepared to give the "I was only following orders" a try out.
The reality is I don't want to spend the next 15-20 years like the last, and that is what Nick & Co are offering, without an understanding and acceptance of what happened in the past, then it will repeat itself.
Thursday, October 15, 2015
Police Political Badge
Monday, October 12, 2015
No Names, No Number and No Rank
If anyone knows please comment.
Thursday, July 09, 2015
Back to Brabners
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
Arts Vigilantes.
Perhaps conspiracy to pervert the courses of justice?
A life spent pilfering from the public purse via 3rd rate arts projects?
Perhaps just stupidity and gullibility?
Perhaps criminal conspiracy?
Anyway, all will out soon.
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Liverpool man awarded £25,000 at Liverpool County Court after Jury decide he had been assaulted, falsely imprisoned and prosecuted maliciously by Merseyside Police officers
http://www.broudiejacksoncanter.co.uk/news/2014/08/liverpool-man-awarded-25000-at-liverpool-county-court-after-jury-decide-he-had-been-assaulted-falsely-imprisoned-and-prosecuted-maliciously-by-merseyside-police-officers
Sunday, June 29, 2014
Lost and Found
However, after many years the subject managed to find someone at Brabners who took mere minutes to find the statements that Lake had failed to find. The question is was it simple incompetence that made Lake incapable of finding the statements or something more worrying.
Saturday, June 21, 2014
Hayley Sherwin
Det Supt Tim Keelan, Jane Kennedy & PC Haley Sherwen |
In the case of Sherwin, she received an email from someone trying to locate another officer, despite this being clearly a case of mistaken ID and there being nothing at all threatening in the email, simply a request for information and clarification, Sherwen flipped and made allegations of harassment include comments about the author being delusional and there being no telling what they could do. Not the reaction of someone who is supposed to be working in the mental health area.
When the same individual contacted their then MP to try and get answers to similar questions, part of which was why Merseyside police believed they were severely mentally ill. They were abused by a member of her staff and complained to Kennedy. The result was not an investigation and a claim that without recordings of the phone call, it was impossible to ascertain the truth to tell, but a simple statement that her staff didn't do it and "were beyond suspicion".
This wasn't the first accusation made by a Merseyside Police officer to this individual, several others from then DCC Jon Murphy, PC Beatie and a Sergeant at Maghull had all been similarly abusive.
The police's belief that this individual had been previously sectioned, caused them not only to abuse them but to write to their doctor asking for details of the illness and for the FME to refuse to accept the name of the group GP practice given as their doctor, writing instead that the DP had refused to name their doctor.
These are not people who can live up to their commitments.
Friday, June 06, 2014
Damian Update
Saturday, May 03, 2014
7172 McVeigh
You would think that this would be prime grounds for an appeal, but no, all the boxes were ticked and the investigating officer did nothing wrong by not doing any proper investigation or rechecking before completing the report convenient hey.
Any comments Jane Kennedy or is it an operational matter?